There are three different approaches to ERP implementation. big bang, phased, and parallel. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Let\u2019s find out what is the best ERP adoption approach for your company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Big Bang ERP Implementation Vs Phased ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nEach strategy of ERP implementation has certain advantages and risks. What works best for an organization depends on its available resources and expectations from the software. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Two of the most common strategies for ERP implementation are – Big Bang and Phased Implementation. However, businesses can also combine these two implementation styles, choosing to go for a big bang strategy for smaller units and using the phased implementation approach for larger units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Under the big bang ERP implementation strategy, a business shifts to the new ERP system in one go. All the modules and other changes go live simultaneously across departments. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Whereas in phased ERP implementation, each phase of the project goes live at a separate time. Hence, older systems are replaced based on factors like business unit (HR, logistics, finance, and others), module, location of facilities\/ offices, among others. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Big bang implementation is best suited when an organization needs ERP implementation for few functional areas. The phased ERP process works better for deploying the software in a larger setup. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If implemented correctly, the big bang approach is faster and less expensive, but it is quite risky. The training has to be completed by the launch date. If not, productivity can drop. The implementation process is spread over a longer span in the phased ERP strategy, but it is more practical. Employees get more time to adapt and adjust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Try Out: ERP Software<\/a> | Retail ERP Software<\/a> | Manufacturing ERP Software<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/span>What is Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nIn Phased Approach for ERP Implementation, each phase of the project goes live at a separate time. Hence, older systems are replaced based on factors like business unit (HR, logistics, finance, and others), module, location of facilities\/ offices, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Advantages & Disadvantages of Phased ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nProper configuration, testing and data validation are crucial to resolving any bottleneck in software adoption before the ERP goes live. In addition, a proper data recovery plan is necessary so that the work is not lost in case the entire system crashes after the Big Bang implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the phased ERP approach, it is easier to test and validate as the bits are smaller. This means employees, business partners, and customers face no issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Pros of Phased ERP Implementation Approach<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nBetter usability and adoption of ERP system: <\/strong>Employees get enough time to learn and adapt to the ERP software in a phased manner.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nVulnerabilities can be fixed quickly: <\/strong>Implementing smaller chunks helps identify issues and fix them before they turn into a problem. Phased ERP implementation approach is better than figuring out where the problem lies in the complete project after its launch.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nLower risk: <\/strong>Teams can assess, analyze, and optimize each module and improve efficiency when the project is still ongoing. If the entire budget is spent at once and it turns out to be a disaster, it puts a huge burden on the business.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nStreamlined process: <\/strong>The workload is spread out in phases, making it easier to streamline the deployment of tools, features, and components. Lesser internal resources are needed for the completion of each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>Cons of Phased Approach for ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nLonger process: <\/strong>More time is needed for the phased ERP implementation and testing, resulting in the delayed ROI.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nMore money: <\/strong>The investment is higher. The company must use the old and new systems simultaneously, as they must be bridged for data migration. There are chances of overlapping or sunk costs in each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nCo-dependency: <\/strong>It is not feasible to split a solution into several phases if a co-dependency exists between the functional areas or modules.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>How to Increase User Adoption With Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nUser Adoption is easier with a phased ERP implementation process. Employees may not have the required technical expertise to understand the system if features are implemented at once. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If the entire ERP module is implemented at once, it will take more time to train employees. Otherwise, it will create higher chances of confusion due to poor comprehension. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
While starting with a new ERP system, every employee takes a different amount of time to adjust to the new user interface and workflow. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, it is important to follow a phased and timed approach. The employees can better understand the system’s value in reducing their workload and provide feedback on improvement in productivity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>5 Stages to Increase User Adoption with Phased ERP Implementation Strategy<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n![\"5](\"https:\/\/cdn.techjockey.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/5-Stages-to-Increase-User-Adoption-with-Phased-ERP-Implementation-Infographics.png\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\nThe process starts long before finalizing the ERP software and continues even after the rollout in a phased implementation. It can cover weeks, months, or even years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 1: Planning well in advance<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nProject members should research and understand the requirements to solve the problems existing in the current system. Then, dedicate enough time to prepare an ERP implementation plan that can fulfil the needs of everyone and is simplest to adopt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Employees should be assigned different tasks such as issuing requests for proposals, choosing the potential vendors and ERP systems, and other tasks during the implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 2: Designing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTeam members decide what features are of utmost importance and how they can incorporate them. The team may decide to customize the ERP software or add modules to the existing solution. The most effective way of data migration without disturbing the business operations is also determined. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Various factors are taken into consideration while planning ERP implementation to modify existing workflows. For example, the team can create specialized interfaces to manage the integration between the old and new ERP system so that critical functionalities are not affected in migration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Further, the project team can define standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the workflow during the transition period. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 3: Development and testing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe ERP vendor and in-house project team that includes members having different expertise work together at this stage. The software is configured according to the needs after proper discussion. Data migration, documentation, preparing training resources, and other activities are done during this phase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a phased ERP implementation, the timeline must be set after considering core processes like financials, inventory, database, reporting, sales, etc. After the successful first phase, the integration planning is done for purchase, advanced warehouse management<\/a>, advanced analytics, CRM, and other systems in the successive phases. <\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the transition is from an on-premise ERP system to a cloud-hosted or hybrid software, multiple factors like connectivity, security, maintenance should be considered. After building the ERP, test the system with all potential use cases. This may take time but will save the struggle involved if the employees face it after deployment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>What is Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nIn Phased Approach for ERP Implementation, each phase of the project goes live at a separate time. Hence, older systems are replaced based on factors like business unit (HR, logistics, finance, and others), module, location of facilities\/ offices, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Advantages & Disadvantages of Phased ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nProper configuration, testing and data validation are crucial to resolving any bottleneck in software adoption before the ERP goes live. In addition, a proper data recovery plan is necessary so that the work is not lost in case the entire system crashes after the Big Bang implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the phased ERP approach, it is easier to test and validate as the bits are smaller. This means employees, business partners, and customers face no issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Pros of Phased ERP Implementation Approach<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nBetter usability and adoption of ERP system: <\/strong>Employees get enough time to learn and adapt to the ERP software in a phased manner.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nVulnerabilities can be fixed quickly: <\/strong>Implementing smaller chunks helps identify issues and fix them before they turn into a problem. Phased ERP implementation approach is better than figuring out where the problem lies in the complete project after its launch.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nLower risk: <\/strong>Teams can assess, analyze, and optimize each module and improve efficiency when the project is still ongoing. If the entire budget is spent at once and it turns out to be a disaster, it puts a huge burden on the business.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nStreamlined process: <\/strong>The workload is spread out in phases, making it easier to streamline the deployment of tools, features, and components. Lesser internal resources are needed for the completion of each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>Cons of Phased Approach for ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nLonger process: <\/strong>More time is needed for the phased ERP implementation and testing, resulting in the delayed ROI.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nMore money: <\/strong>The investment is higher. The company must use the old and new systems simultaneously, as they must be bridged for data migration. There are chances of overlapping or sunk costs in each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nCo-dependency: <\/strong>It is not feasible to split a solution into several phases if a co-dependency exists between the functional areas or modules.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>How to Increase User Adoption With Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nUser Adoption is easier with a phased ERP implementation process. Employees may not have the required technical expertise to understand the system if features are implemented at once. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If the entire ERP module is implemented at once, it will take more time to train employees. Otherwise, it will create higher chances of confusion due to poor comprehension. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
While starting with a new ERP system, every employee takes a different amount of time to adjust to the new user interface and workflow. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, it is important to follow a phased and timed approach. The employees can better understand the system’s value in reducing their workload and provide feedback on improvement in productivity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>5 Stages to Increase User Adoption with Phased ERP Implementation Strategy<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\nThe process starts long before finalizing the ERP software and continues even after the rollout in a phased implementation. It can cover weeks, months, or even years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 1: Planning well in advance<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nProject members should research and understand the requirements to solve the problems existing in the current system. Then, dedicate enough time to prepare an ERP implementation plan that can fulfil the needs of everyone and is simplest to adopt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Employees should be assigned different tasks such as issuing requests for proposals, choosing the potential vendors and ERP systems, and other tasks during the implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 2: Designing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTeam members decide what features are of utmost importance and how they can incorporate them. The team may decide to customize the ERP software or add modules to the existing solution. The most effective way of data migration without disturbing the business operations is also determined. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Various factors are taken into consideration while planning ERP implementation to modify existing workflows. For example, the team can create specialized interfaces to manage the integration between the old and new ERP system so that critical functionalities are not affected in migration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Further, the project team can define standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the workflow during the transition period. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 3: Development and testing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe ERP vendor and in-house project team that includes members having different expertise work together at this stage. The software is configured according to the needs after proper discussion. Data migration, documentation, preparing training resources, and other activities are done during this phase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a phased ERP implementation, the timeline must be set after considering core processes like financials, inventory, database, reporting, sales, etc. After the successful first phase, the integration planning is done for purchase, advanced warehouse management<\/a>, advanced analytics, CRM, and other systems in the successive phases. <\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the transition is from an on-premise ERP system to a cloud-hosted or hybrid software, multiple factors like connectivity, security, maintenance should be considered. After building the ERP, test the system with all potential use cases. This may take time but will save the struggle involved if the employees face it after deployment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Proper configuration, testing and data validation are crucial to resolving any bottleneck in software adoption before the ERP goes live. In addition, a proper data recovery plan is necessary so that the work is not lost in case the entire system crashes after the Big Bang implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the phased ERP approach, it is easier to test and validate as the bits are smaller. This means employees, business partners, and customers face no issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Pros of Phased ERP Implementation Approach<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nBetter usability and adoption of ERP system: <\/strong>Employees get enough time to learn and adapt to the ERP software in a phased manner.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nVulnerabilities can be fixed quickly: <\/strong>Implementing smaller chunks helps identify issues and fix them before they turn into a problem. Phased ERP implementation approach is better than figuring out where the problem lies in the complete project after its launch.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nLower risk: <\/strong>Teams can assess, analyze, and optimize each module and improve efficiency when the project is still ongoing. If the entire budget is spent at once and it turns out to be a disaster, it puts a huge burden on the business.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nStreamlined process: <\/strong>The workload is spread out in phases, making it easier to streamline the deployment of tools, features, and components. Lesser internal resources are needed for the completion of each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>Cons of Phased Approach for ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nLonger process: <\/strong>More time is needed for the phased ERP implementation and testing, resulting in the delayed ROI.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nMore money: <\/strong>The investment is higher. The company must use the old and new systems simultaneously, as they must be bridged for data migration. There are chances of overlapping or sunk costs in each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\nCo-dependency: <\/strong>It is not feasible to split a solution into several phases if a co-dependency exists between the functional areas or modules.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/span>How to Increase User Adoption With Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nUser Adoption is easier with a phased ERP implementation process. Employees may not have the required technical expertise to understand the system if features are implemented at once. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If the entire ERP module is implemented at once, it will take more time to train employees. Otherwise, it will create higher chances of confusion due to poor comprehension. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
While starting with a new ERP system, every employee takes a different amount of time to adjust to the new user interface and workflow. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, it is important to follow a phased and timed approach. The employees can better understand the system’s value in reducing their workload and provide feedback on improvement in productivity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>5 Stages to Increase User Adoption with Phased ERP Implementation Strategy<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\nThe process starts long before finalizing the ERP software and continues even after the rollout in a phased implementation. It can cover weeks, months, or even years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 1: Planning well in advance<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nProject members should research and understand the requirements to solve the problems existing in the current system. Then, dedicate enough time to prepare an ERP implementation plan that can fulfil the needs of everyone and is simplest to adopt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Employees should be assigned different tasks such as issuing requests for proposals, choosing the potential vendors and ERP systems, and other tasks during the implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 2: Designing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTeam members decide what features are of utmost importance and how they can incorporate them. The team may decide to customize the ERP software or add modules to the existing solution. The most effective way of data migration without disturbing the business operations is also determined. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Various factors are taken into consideration while planning ERP implementation to modify existing workflows. For example, the team can create specialized interfaces to manage the integration between the old and new ERP system so that critical functionalities are not affected in migration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Further, the project team can define standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the workflow during the transition period. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stage 3: Development and testing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe ERP vendor and in-house project team that includes members having different expertise work together at this stage. The software is configured according to the needs after proper discussion. Data migration, documentation, preparing training resources, and other activities are done during this phase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a phased ERP implementation, the timeline must be set after considering core processes like financials, inventory, database, reporting, sales, etc. After the successful first phase, the integration planning is done for purchase, advanced warehouse management<\/a>, advanced analytics, CRM, and other systems in the successive phases. <\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the transition is from an on-premise ERP system to a cloud-hosted or hybrid software, multiple factors like connectivity, security, maintenance should be considered. After building the ERP, test the system with all potential use cases. This may take time but will save the struggle involved if the employees face it after deployment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Better usability and adoption of ERP system: <\/strong>Employees get enough time to learn and adapt to the ERP software in a phased manner.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\n Vulnerabilities can be fixed quickly: <\/strong>Implementing smaller chunks helps identify issues and fix them before they turn into a problem. Phased ERP implementation approach is better than figuring out where the problem lies in the complete project after its launch.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\n Lower risk: <\/strong>Teams can assess, analyze, and optimize each module and improve efficiency when the project is still ongoing. If the entire budget is spent at once and it turns out to be a disaster, it puts a huge burden on the business.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\n Streamlined process: <\/strong>The workload is spread out in phases, making it easier to streamline the deployment of tools, features, and components. Lesser internal resources are needed for the completion of each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n Longer process: <\/strong>More time is needed for the phased ERP implementation and testing, resulting in the delayed ROI.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\n More money: <\/strong>The investment is higher. The company must use the old and new systems simultaneously, as they must be bridged for data migration. There are chances of overlapping or sunk costs in each phase.<\/p><\/li>\n\n\n\n Co-dependency: <\/strong>It is not feasible to split a solution into several phases if a co-dependency exists between the functional areas or modules.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n User Adoption is easier with a phased ERP implementation process. Employees may not have the required technical expertise to understand the system if features are implemented at once. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If the entire ERP module is implemented at once, it will take more time to train employees. Otherwise, it will create higher chances of confusion due to poor comprehension. <\/p>\n\n\n\n While starting with a new ERP system, every employee takes a different amount of time to adjust to the new user interface and workflow. <\/p>\n\n\n\n However, it is important to follow a phased and timed approach. The employees can better understand the system’s value in reducing their workload and provide feedback on improvement in productivity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The process starts long before finalizing the ERP software and continues even after the rollout in a phased implementation. It can cover weeks, months, or even years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Stage 1: Planning well in advance<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Project members should research and understand the requirements to solve the problems existing in the current system. Then, dedicate enough time to prepare an ERP implementation plan that can fulfil the needs of everyone and is simplest to adopt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Employees should be assigned different tasks such as issuing requests for proposals, choosing the potential vendors and ERP systems, and other tasks during the implementation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Stage 2: Designing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Team members decide what features are of utmost importance and how they can incorporate them. The team may decide to customize the ERP software or add modules to the existing solution. The most effective way of data migration without disturbing the business operations is also determined. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Various factors are taken into consideration while planning ERP implementation to modify existing workflows. For example, the team can create specialized interfaces to manage the integration between the old and new ERP system so that critical functionalities are not affected in migration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Further, the project team can define standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the workflow during the transition period. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Stage 3: Development and testing<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n The ERP vendor and in-house project team that includes members having different expertise work together at this stage. The software is configured according to the needs after proper discussion. Data migration, documentation, preparing training resources, and other activities are done during this phase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In a phased ERP implementation, the timeline must be set after considering core processes like financials, inventory, database, reporting, sales, etc. After the successful first phase, the integration planning is done for purchase, advanced warehouse management<\/a>, advanced analytics, CRM, and other systems in the successive phases. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If the transition is from an on-premise ERP system to a cloud-hosted or hybrid software, multiple factors like connectivity, security, maintenance should be considered. After building the ERP, test the system with all potential use cases. This may take time but will save the struggle involved if the employees face it after deployment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/span>Cons of Phased Approach for ERP Implementation<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/span>How to Increase User Adoption With Phased ERP Implementation Approach?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>5 Stages to Increase User Adoption with Phased ERP Implementation Strategy<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n