Joomla Reviews & Ratings

4/5

“Joomla gave me a lot of flexibility, but managing extensions was tricky”

I used to work with Wix, but after some time, I felt like I outgrew its capabilities. Joomla offered me more options, and it felt like a good middle ground between simple platforms like Wix and more advanced ones like Drupal.

Pros : Joomla has been a great tool for creating my website because of how flexible it is. I was impressed with the wide range of extensions and templates that made my site look professional without much effort. Its multilingual capabilities were a big plus, as I needed to create content in multiple languages, and Joomla handled it with ease.

Cons : One of the major challenges I faced with Joomla was managing the extensions. Sometimes, the updates would cause conflicts with other parts of the site, and I had to spend hours fixing things. Also, while it offers flexibility, there’s still a bit of a learning curve, especially if you want to make bigger changes to the site’s appearance or functionality.

Switched from : Wix

Reason to switch : I wanted a platform that had more advanced features but didn’t feel too overwhelming.

4/5

“A More Flexible Alternative to WordPress: My Experience with Joomla”

I've found Joomla to be a fantastic alternative to WordPress, particularly for those who need more control over their website's layout and security. With its extensive range of features, it provides robust support for various needs, from multilingual management to advanced user permissions. Although it doesn't match WordPress in terms of the sheer number of available extensions, its flexibility and security make it a solid choice.

Pros : Joomla offers flexibility in controlling your website pages once you’re used to its component and plugin naming system. It is also known for being more secure compared to WordPress. The variety of native features and its solid support for multilingual sites are great assets.

Cons : While Joomla has many extensions, it doesn't have as many as WordPress. If you're new, some of the more advanced features can be tricky to grasp, and the learning curve can be steep. Also, dealing with big files or themes can sometimes cause issues.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla because it offered more flexibility and security than WordPress. After using WordPress for a while, I found Joomla’s advanced features and better control over page management to be a significant improvement for my needs.

4/5

“Joomla: A Perfect CMS with Useful Extensions”

Joomla provides a range of extensions and an easy-to-use editor, making it accessible for users without coding experience. However, the platform can be a bit clunky to navigate, and the lack of a dedicated support team can be a drawback compared to paid alternatives.

Pros : Joomla offers a large number of components and plugins, which can be very useful for enhancing your site. The editor is easy to use and doesn’t require coding skills, making it accessible for beginners.

Cons : Navigating Joomla can be clunky, and support is not as robust as paid options. The open-source nature means fewer dedicated support resources.

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla for its extensive extension library and ease of use. Although Wix offers more straightforward site creation, Joomla’s flexibility and range of features were more suitable for my specific needs.

4/5

“Joomla: A Practical Choice for Content Management Needs”

Joomla provides a practical solution for managing content, with an easy installation process and a variety of plugins. While frequent updates can be inconvenient, its overall ease of use and available features make it a solid CMS option.

Pros : Joomla is easy to install and use, with many available components and plugins. It’s a great choice for those who want a straightforward CMS with plenty of options for customization.

Cons : The constant updates can be a hassle, as it seems like there’s always a new version to install.

Reason to switch : I switched to Joomla for its practical features and customization options. While WordPress is popular, Joomla’s straightforward approach and range of plugins offered a better fit for my needs.

4/5

“Joomla: A Reliable CMS with a range of features”

Joomla is a reliable content management system for sites requiring flexibility.

Pros : Joomla is perfect tool for creating sites with restricted access areas. Its management of code and performance is good.

Cons : The number of plugins and features available is less compared to WordPress.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla for its specialized access control and site management capabilities. While WordPress offers more plugins, Joomla’s detailed control features better met my needs.

3.7/5

“A Great Content Management System for Versatility and Control”

Joomla stands out as a versatile content management system that’s ideal for users who need control and flexibility. Its native features, such as multilingual support and template management, are very useful. While it may have fewer extensions than WordPress and can be a bit tricky to navigate at times, Joomla remains a robust choice for managing content effectively.

Pros : Joomla's ease of use and the range of native features are impressive. Its ability to manage multiple templates and multilingual content makes it a powerful tool. The guided tours in the latest versions are helpful, and the strong access control list (ACL) is a big plus for managing permissions.

Cons : One downside is the limited variety of extensions compared to other platforms like WordPress. Finding solutions for specific problems can be challenging, and the support community is not as active as it used to be.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I switched to Joomla to take advantage of its advanced features and better access control options. While WordPress is popular, Joomla offered the specific tools and flexibility I needed for managing my content.

3.7/5

“Ideal for Advanced Users Needing Detailed Access Control”

Joomla excels in managing sites with specific access control needs and offers robust performance and template options. While its community support and the number of available plugins may not match WordPress, it remains a strong choice for detailed content management and site control.

Pros : Joomla’s access control level (ACL) is fantastic for creating sites with restricted areas. It handles code well and ensures fast, fluid site performance. The community offers excellent templates, enhancing the overall user experience.

Cons : Joomla’s plugin and feature count is not as extensive as WordPress’s, and the community support has diminished over the years. Customizations can become more expensive due to fewer available resources.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I opted for Joomla due to its superior access control features and site performance. Although WordPress has a larger plugin ecosystem, Joomla’s detailed management capabilities were more suited to my needs.

3.7/5

“Joomla: A Flexible CMS with Comprehensive Features”

Joomla is a robust content management system with a wide range of features and frameworks. Its support for various page builders and comprehensive documentation make it a good choice for those willing to invest time in learning. However, the lack of certain modern features and integrated backups can be limiting.

Pros : Joomla’s extensive documentation and advanced frameworks like Gantry and Yootheme PageBuilder make it a versatile choice. It supports various page builders and offers a high learning curve for those who want to dive deep into its features.

Cons : Joomla version 4 lacks JavaScript animations and support for multiple frameworks. It doesn’t include integrated backup features, which can be a drawback.

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla for its advanced frameworks and extensive feature set. While Drupal offers similar capabilities, Joomla’s specific tools and ease of use for complex sites were more aligned with my project needs.

3.7/5

“A Versatile Platform for Building and Managing E-Commerce Sites”

Joomla shines in building e-commerce sites and applications, thanks to its MVC architecture and customization options. It’s a powerful platform if you have the technical skills, but it may be more complex than needed for basic CMS requirements.

Pros : Joomla is perfect for developing and deploying e-commerce websites and applications. Its MVC architecture allows for easy customization if you're familiar with PHP and MySQL. The strong developer community is a valuable resource for resolving issues.

Cons : Customizing templates and extensions can get complicated if you're new to PHP and MVC. For simpler CMS sites, Joomla might be overkill.

Switched from : Strapi

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla for its advanced capabilities in e-commerce and development. Although Shopify is more user-friendly for online stores, Joomla’s flexibility and developer support offered more tailored solutions for my specific needs.

3.5/5

“An Established Choice for Comprehensive Content Management”

Joomla has been my go-to content management system for 16 years, providing a comprehensive and scalable solution for various needs. It’s been particularly effective for creating detailed business sites and custom components. However, frequent updates and changes to the API can make maintaining and developing with Joomla somewhat cumbersome.

Pros : With years of experience using Joomla, I can vouch for its comprehensive and scalable solutions. It allowed me to build a high-quality business site quickly and efficiently. The marketplace for extensions is extensive, and creating custom components is possible if you have some development skills.

Cons : The rapid changes in Joomla's API can be frustrating. It often requires updates to components, which sometimes feels like starting over. Keeping up with these changes can be a challenge.

Reason to switch : I chose Joomla for its scalability and extensive customization options. While WordPress is widely used, Joomla’s flexibility and the ability to create custom components were crucial for my complex content management needs.