Softr Reviews & Ratings

4.5/5

“Affordable Pricing with Scalability Limitations”

Starting with Softr was budget-friendly and ideal for my initial project scope. However, as demands increased, I faced challenges with scalability, prompting me to explore other platforms that could better accommodate growth.

Pros : Softr offers a range of pricing plans, including a generous free tier, making it accessible for small projects and startups.

Cons : As my project grew, I encountered scalability limitations, particularly with data handling and user management, which required considering alternative solutions.

Switched from : Bubble

Reason to switch : Needed a platform capable of supporting larger-scale applications with enhanced scalability.

4.5/5

“Responsive to Community Feedback”

I appreciate how the Softr team listens to user feedback and implements requested features. However, I sometimes find the customization options limited due to the basic nature of the content blocks.

Pros : Softr is known for incorporating features requested by the community, demonstrating their commitment to user satisfaction.

Cons : The blocks offer only a basic level of flexibility, limiting customization.

Switched from : Quickbase

Reason to switch : Needed more advanced customization options for my project.

4.3/5

“Limited Customization for Complex Applications”

For simple projects, Softr was a great choice. However, as I aimed to build more intricate applications, the platform's constraints became apparent, leading me to seek alternatives with greater customization capabilities.

Pros : Softr's drag-and-drop interface and pre-built templates made it easy to launch a basic web app quickly.

Cons : When attempting to develop more complex applications, I found Softr's customization options limited, particularly in backend flexibility and advanced feature integration.

Switched from : Obviously AI

Reason to switch : Required a platform offering extensive customization and advanced development features.

4.3/5

“Mobile App Development Constraints”

While developing a PWA with Softr was straightforward, the inability to create native mobile apps was a significant drawback, especially when aiming to provide a seamless mobile user experience.

Pros : Softr allowed me to create a Progressive Web App (PWA) that functioned adequately on mobile browsers.

Cons : The lack of support for fully native mobile applications limited the app's performance and user experience on mobile devices.

Switched from : Quixy

Reason to switch : Needed to develop fully native mobile applications to enhance performance and user engagement.

4.2/5

“Great for Simple Sites but Lacks Flexibility for Developers”

While Softr is excellent for creating simple websites quickly, it doesn't offer the flexibility I need as a developer for more complex projects.

Pros : Softr is a great tool to build websites, especially for those without coding experience.

Cons : As a developer, I find it inflexible and lacking features necessary for scalable and complex websites.

Switched from : Riku

Reason to switch : Required more flexibility and scalability for complex web development.

4.2/5

“Great for Simple Sites but Lacks Flexibility for Developers”

While Softr is excellent for creating simple websites quickly, it doesn't offer the flexibility I need as a developer for more complex projects.

Pros : Softr is a great tool to build websites, especially for those without coding experience.

Cons : As a developer, I find it inflexible and lacking features necessary for scalable and complex websites.

Switched from : Riku

Reason to switch : Required more flexibility and scalability for complex web development.

4.2/5

“Responsive Customer Support Enhances Experience”

The responsive customer support team at Softr has been instrumental in resolving issues quickly. However, I did find that some of the more advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans.

Pros : Softr's customer support is prompt and provides meaningful responses, ensuring a smooth user experience.

Cons : Some features are only available in higher-paid plans, which can be limiting.

Switched from : Adalo

Reason to switch : Looking for a platform with more features available in the basic plan.

4.2/5

“Efficient Design Features with Real-Time Sync”

I found the pre-designed content blocks and real-time synchronization with Airtable extremely helpful in speeding up my workflow. The only downside is that some advanced features require upgrading to a more expensive plan.

Pros : The plug-and-play content blocks and live sync with Airtable save significant time during the design process.

Cons : Some useful features are only available in higher-paid plans.

Switched from : Strikingly

Reason to switch : Looking for a platform that offers more advanced features in its basic plan.

4.1/5

“User-Friendly Interface Saves Time”

The platform's intuitive design allowed me to set up my project quickly without any coding knowledge. However, I was disappointed to learn that it doesn't support fully native mobile apps.

Pros : Softr is praised for its simplicity and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.

Cons : Limited mobile app capabilities, as it primarily supports Progressive Web Apps (PWAs).

Switched from : Gooey AI

Reason to switch : Needed to develop a fully native mobile application.

4.1/5

“Intuitive No-Code Platform with Basic Features”

As someone new to no-code platforms, I appreciated Softr's simplicity and ease of use. However, I realized that for more complex projects, the basic features might not be enough.

Pros : The application is extremely easy to use and very intuitive.

Cons : The features are pretty basic, which might not suffice for more complex projects.

Switched from : Bubble

Reason to switch : Needed advanced features for a more complex project.