Lojistic Reviews & Ratings

4.7/5

“Affordable Asset Management for Small Businesses”

Lojistic fit our budget while still giving us reliable asset tracking.

Pros : Pricing is reasonable and predictable.

Cons : Not ideal for enterprise-level asset management.

Switched from : ServiceNow

Reason to switch : ServiceNow was too complex and expensive for our needs, while Lojistic focused on essentials.

4.6/5

“Simple Asset Tracking That Replaced Our Spreadsheets”

My company moved from spreadsheets to Lojistic, and it immediately improved how we track and assign equipment. Everything is centralized and easy to access.

Pros : Lojistic is easy to use and very straightforward for tracking equipment. The dashboard gives a clear view of asset status and location.

Cons : Advanced reporting options are limited.

Switched from : Excel

Reason to switch : Excel required manual updates and caused errors, while Lojistic automated asset tracking and history.

4.6/5

“Quick Setup and Helpful Support”

The onboarding process was smooth, and support helped us get started quickly.

Pros : Setup was fast, and support responded quickly to questions.

Cons : Documentation could be more detailed.

Switched from : AssetTiger

Reason to switch : AssetTiger had limitations on free plans, while Lojistic offered better long-term value.

4.5/5

“Good Maintenance Tracking but Basic Automation”

Lojistic helped us keep track of maintenance history, which reduced downtime.

Pros : Maintenance schedules and asset history are easy to manage.

Cons : Maintenance automation is limited.

Switched from : UpKeep

Reason to switch : UpKeep was maintenance-focused, while Lojistic covered both tracking and basic maintenance.

4.5/5

“Clean Dashboard With Clear Asset Visibility”

I can quickly see which assets are available or checked out, which helps planning.

Pros : The dashboard shows asset availability and status clearly.

Cons : Reporting visuals are basic.

Switched from : Snipe-IT

Reason to switch : Snipe-IT required more technical setup, while Lojistic was cloud-based and easier.

4.3/5

“Best for Teams That Want Simple Asset Control”

Lojistic became our go-to tool for asset accountability. It’s simple, reliable, and effective.

Pros : Lojistic focuses on core asset tracking without unnecessary features.

Cons : Limited advanced analytics.

Switched from : NetSuite

Reason to switch : NetSuite was too heavy and costly, while Lojistic handled our day-to-day asset tracking needs.

4.3/5

“Works Well Across Multiple Locations”

Lojistic helped us track equipment across different offices without confusion.

Pros : Cloud access allows tracking assets across locations.

Cons : Location-based reporting could be deeper.

Switched from : ManageEngine

Reason to switch : ManageEngine was more IT-focused, while Lojistic suited general equipment tracking.

4.2/5

“Great for Tracking Shared Equipment”

Shared tools were constantly misplaced before. Lojistic gave us accountability and visibility.

Pros : Lojistic makes it easy to see who has what equipment and when it’s due back.

Cons : Notifications could be more customizable.

Switched from : Sortly

Reason to switch : Sortly was visually appealing, but Lojistic handled equipment assignments better.

4.2/5

“Barcode Scanning Makes Equipment Tracking Efficient”

Using barcodes with Lojistic saved time and reduced mistakes when issuing equipment.

Pros : Barcode scanning speeds up asset check-in and check-out.

Cons : RFID features are basic compared to enterprise systems.

Switched from : EZOfficeInventory

Reason to switch : EZOfficeInventory was more complex, while Lojistic focused on simplicity and speed.

4.2/5

“Easy to Learn Asset Management Tool”

Lojistic didn’t require training sessions. Staff learned check-in and check-out almost immediately.

Pros : The interface is clean, and onboarding was quick for our team.

Cons : Custom workflows are somewhat limited.

Switched from : Asset Panda

Reason to switch : Asset Panda offered more customization, but Lojistic was easier to learn and faster to deploy.