Litmos LMS Reviews & Ratings

4.5/5

“Learning Paths Are Handy, With Limits”

I appreciated building structured learning journeys, though I hit caps and compliance mismatches during complex workflows.

Pros : Creating sequential learning paths reduces learner confusion—it’s practical and intuitive.

Cons : Path limitations (like 50-course max) and quirks with compliance tracking cause occasional friction.

Switched from : Absorb LMS

Reason to switch : Litmos offered better features than Absorb.

4.5/5

“Quick Deployment with Some UX Drag”

Setup was quick, but daily tasks like assigning badges or editing pages are more tedious than expected.

Pros : Deployment was immediate, and user interface is clean and simple. It works especially well for compliance use.

Cons : Admin-side workflows feel slow certain actions take too many steps.

Switched from : Absorb LMS

Reason to switch : Absorb gave me the same rapid setup with a more refined and efficient admin interface.

4.5/5

“Clean UI, but Not the Most Engaging for Learners”

Course creation is easy, but learner experience isn't dynamic—it’s functional but feels dated.

Pros : The design is clean, and course creation is accessible for admins and users.

Cons : The interface felt static and lacked interactivity—like a dated “page-turner,” not engaging.

Switched from : LearnWorlds

Reason to switch : LearnWorlds offered more interactive and modern course elements, helping learner engagement.

4.5/5

“Excellent Support, Needs Mobile Improvement”

Support and product quality impress me daily, but mobile users struggle after OS updates.

Pros : The client success team is responsive, and the solution feels robust and dependable.

Cons : The mobile app is unreliable—users sometimes can’t log in after updates.

Switched from : TalentLMS

Reason to switch : TalentLMS offered a more stable mobile experience while still providing strong support.

4.3/5

“Intuitive Setup, Strong Compliance Features”

Setting up training is seamless courses flow logically, and cert tracking keeps compliance on point. But managing individual permissions by team can get messy.

Pros : The interface is intuitive and onboarding is smooth. I love the automated learning paths and certification tracking.

Cons : User permissions are clunky, limiting granular control.

Switched from : Absorb LMS

Reason to switch : Litmos was more intuitive.

4.3/5

“Reliable and Surprisingly Resilient”

Litmos ran consistently, even in tough networks, which was critical for our teams, thanks to its performance. Cost is higher, but reliability matters.

Pros : We had network constraints—but Litmos performed without interruptions.

Cons : Price is higher, particularly after SAP acquisition, but performance stays solid.

Switched from : TalentLMS

Reason to switch : TalentLMS had similar stability with a more flexible pricing structure.

4.2/5

“Efficient Content Management with Limited Reporting”

I appreciate quick content reuse, but digging into raw data for behavior tracking isn’t possible.

Pros : Creating courses is easy I can reuse content and link modules across multiple courses.

Cons : I can’t retrieve raw SCORM data when needed, which is frustrating for deep analysis.

Switched from : Docebo

Reason to switch : Docebo lets me access raw data and deep analytics alongside easy content reuse.

4.2/5

“Affordable and Rich in Integrations”

We connected with PayPal, Zoom, and Salesforce easily, but configuring integrations takes some digging.

Pros : Onboarding is fast, and integration options are extensive and well-designed.

Cons : The admin interface could be cleaner. Integrations feel buried under too many layers.

Switched from : LearnUpon

Reason to switch : LearnUpon offered a similarly rich integration set with cleaner administrative UX.

4/5

“Good for Corporate Training, but Basic on Social Features”

Perfect for structured, procedural training but feels stark when peer collaboration or social learning is needed.

Pros : It covers essential LMS needs—tracks progress, supports content creation, and it's accessible mobile-wise.

Cons : It’s not ideal for social learning—lack of discussion spaces or peer engagement tools.

Switched from : Docebo

Reason to switch : Docebo was not that good for strong social learning.

4/5

“Scalable and Cost-Effective, with Some Gaps”

As our user base grew, Litmos stayed cost-effective, and licensing isn’t a barrier. But I can’t tailor admin roles for complex teams.

Pros : Scales well with usage-based pricing and has a huge off-the-shelf course library.

Cons : Admin roles are limited and not customizable, which hurts flexibility.

Switched from : Docebo

Reason to switch : Docebo provided flexible role-based permissions while scaling affordably.