TenderEasy Reviews & Ratings

4.5/5

“Very Efficient Tool for Daily Freight Tendering”

In my logistics procurement role, I switched to TenderEasy and found that our tendering process (RFQs, carrier responses) became far more streamlined. The platform let me reduce manual spreadsheets and legacy email chains.

Pros : It’s user-friendly & very easy to use for daily basis works. Customer support is excellent & helps to reduce a lot of manual work.

Cons : The new version was not properly prepared. Certain functions were missing … it is still being adjusted after launch.

Switched from : TruckBook

Reason to switch : I switched because our prior process was too manual and error-prone; TenderEasy offered a purpose-built freight tendering portal which promised faster, cleaner workflows and better carrier management.

4.5/5

“Useful Analytics and Carrier Network, Yet Late-Change Limitations”

My role required tracking which carriers responded, seeing change history, and maintaining audit trails. TenderEasy delivered those. But when we needed to alter a booking late in the process, the system was less flexible.

Pros : What I like most is the transparency and ease of use and you can see who made the changes and when.

Cons : It is not possible to make late changes and if I make a mistake, there is no going back.

Switched from : Linbis FMS

Reason to switch : We switched because we lacked transparency with carriers and responses; TenderEasy’s visibility into who changed what when appealed strongly.

4.5/5

“Strong Freight Procurement Focus, with Some Performance Hiccups”

Our sourcing team adopted TenderEasy to handle both annual contract-tendering and spot bid cycles. The benchmarking data (via integration with Upply) was very helpful. Yet sometimes during peak bid rounds the system lagged, causing frustration.

Pros : Simplify the tendering process, monitor spot bids, real-time benchmarking data.

Cons : Server slow-downs … performance complicates using the system on daily basis.

Switched from : Linbis FMS

Reason to switch : I switched because our previous platform supported generic procurement but lacked freight-specific RFQ, benchmarking and spot-bidding features. TenderEasy offered those tailored capabilities.

4.5/5

“Good Value and Speed in Booking Transports”

I moved our transport tendering onto TenderEasy and found we could launch tender rounds quicker, get carrier quotes faster, and book transports more smoothly. For our smaller volumes, the cost/benefit was solid. Interface could feel dated in places.

Pros : Fast entry and uncomplicated entry of shipping orders.

Cons : The interface is very old looking and isn’t always easy to see which line you are selecting.

Switched from : Magaya

Reason to switch : I switched because we needed to accelerate our procurement cycle and reduce time delays, TenderEasy’s automation provided that uplift.

4.5/5

“Excellent Support and Quick Onboarding, Yet Feature Gaps Exist”

From day one the TenderEasy team helped get us up and running quickly. My users felt comfortable early. But as we matured our usage, we noticed some missing features (for advanced logistics exceptions) and wished for faster enhancements.

Pros : Customer support is reliable and answer asap in case of any issues.

Cons : Some features still need to be developed to become an excellent system.

Switched from : Kuebix TMS

Reason to switch : I switched because our earlier tool required long training and still lacked support; TenderEasy’s easier onboarding and responsive support made the move worthwhile.

4.3/5

“Clear Interface and Strong Support, With Some Constraints”

As a procurement planner, I appreciated how TenderEasy’s UI allowed me to invite carriers, send tenders and monitor responses more intuitively. The support team was responsive when I hit issues. The downside: certain admin tasks (like email subject customisation) were limited.

Pros : The portal is easy to use and very intuitive. I also really appreciate the support, because the tips are always valuable and I have never been refused help.

Cons : The subject line in the e-mail cannot be adjusted and contact duplicates cannot be deleted.

Switched from : FreightPrint

Reason to switch : I switched because the old portal was clunky, support was weak, and my team kept complaining. TenderEasy offered a more modern interface and better help desk.

4.3/5

“Great For Mid-Sized Logistics Operations, May Need More For Large Complex Firms”

My company runs medium-scale freight operations; TenderEasy provided a good fit. Real-time status and load/tender tracking gave us better control. If I were at a global 3PL with thousands of shipments per day, I might need additional modules.

Pros : It can inquire the delivery information, and I can know the status of the goods.

Cons : For large volumes or very complex flows, I felt some limitations. (Inferred from multiple reviews about system complexity)

Switched from : Shipsy

Reason to switch : I switched from a high-cost global suite that was overkill for our volume. TenderEasy provided sufficient capability at more reasonable cost.

4.3/5

“Handles Automotive Supply-Chain Transport Well, But Filtering Can Be Clunky”

In my automotive-logistics position, TenderEasy is the tool we use daily for booking and tendering. It’s reliable. However when I need very specific filters (e.g., for multi-leg shipments, mixed-mode), finding the exact orders took extra time.

Pros : Very easy to use and very intuitive and I recommend it to other entrepreneurs.

Cons : Complex filtering and searching for certain orders.

Switched from : Rose Rocket

Reason to switch : We switched because our old TMS did not support modern tender analytics and multi-modal freight bidding; TenderEasy offered a more fit-for-purpose solution for transport procurement.

4.2/5

“Strong Freight Tendering Platform That Could Improve UX & Filtering”

I’ve used TenderEasy for daily transport tendering and bidding. For many tasks it works smoothly and helped speed up our process. But when we had high volume of tenders, I found locating specific transport entries or filtering by many criteria slower than I wanted.

Pros : Quickly, I’m satisfied with it, that’s how it should be.

Cons : Interface is a little confusing and sometimes hard to find the transports that you are looking for, more if you have dozens of transport per

Switched from : Shipthis

Reason to switch : I switched because our in-house tool lacked support for spot bidding and benchmarking; TenderEasy offered that capability, even though we accepted some UI trade-offs.

4.2/5

“Transparent Tender Process and Good Carrier Communication, But Late Edits Are Tough”

As logistics coordinator I value how TenderEasy enables inviting multiple carriers, comparing bids and selecting best price. But once the shipment is underway, making late changes in the system can be frustratingly rigid.

Pros : Find truck for huge quantity of our shipments for best price.

Cons : You cannot change order information after it has been shipped.

Switched from : NewageNXT

Reason to switch : I switched because the old workflow lacked structured tender comparison and carrier bidding; TenderEasy offered the process — though with some discipline around late changes.