Bringg Reviews & Ratings

4.6/5

“Reliable Platform With Strong Analytics”

I rely on Bringg reports to track on-time delivery rates and driver performance.

Pros : Bringg’s analytics and dashboards give clear insights into delivery performance.

Cons : Reporting customization could be deeper.

Switched from : Fareye

Reason to switch : FarEye had good analytics, but Bringg’s real-time operational controls were stronger.

4.6/5

“Great for Multi-Carrier Delivery Management”

Bringg helped us standardize delivery processes across different carriers and regions.

Pros : Managing multiple carriers in one platform is very convenient.

Cons : Smaller teams may not need this level of complexity.

Switched from : DispatchTrack

Reason to switch : DispatchTrack worked well, but Bringg offered better scalability for multi-carrier operations.

4.5/5

“Powerful Last-Mile Delivery Platform but Takes Time to Master”

Bringg helped our company gain better control over deliveries and improve customer visibility. Once set up, it became a reliable system for managing large delivery volumes.

Pros : Bringg offers strong last-mile delivery management with real-time tracking, dispatching, and route optimization.

Cons : When I first started using it, the platform felt overwhelming because of the number of configuration options.

Switched from : Onfleet

Reason to switch : We switched from Onfleet because Bringg offered deeper enterprise integrations and more customization for complex delivery operations.

4.5/5

“Real-Time Tracking Improved Customer Experience”

Bringg gave our customers more transparency. The real-time tracking links and notifications improved satisfaction significantly.

Pros : Customers can track deliveries in real time, which reduced support calls.

Cons : Initial setup of tracking notifications required technical help.

Switched from : Shipday

Reason to switch : Shipday was simpler, but Bringg offered more advanced tracking and branding options.

4.5/5

“Improves Coordination Between Teams and Drivers”

Bringg reduced miscommunication by centralizing delivery updates and driver instructions.

Pros : Drivers and dispatch teams stay aligned through the mobile app and dashboard.

Cons : Driver training is required to fully use the app.

Switched from : LogiNext

Reason to switch : LogiNext was feature-rich but harder to configure, while Bringg felt more operationally focused.

4.5/5

“Excellent for Enterprise-Level Delivery Operations”

I use Bringg in a large organization, and it handles thousands of deliveries smoothly. It’s clearly built for enterprise logistics.

Pros : Bringg scales very well and supports complex delivery networks with multiple carriers.

Cons : Pricing is high for small businesses.

Switched from : Tookan

Reason to switch : Tookan worked for smaller operations, but Bringg handled enterprise-level scale and integrations better.

4.5/5

“Strong Dispatch and Route Optimization Tools”

Bringg allowed us to automate dispatch decisions and optimize routes, which improved delivery efficiency.

Pros : Dispatching and route optimization helped us reduce delivery delays.

Cons : The interface can feel complex for new dispatchers.

Switched from : Routific

Reason to switch : Routific focused mainly on routing, while Bringg provided full delivery lifecycle management.

4.5/5

“Stable System for High-Volume Deliveries”

During high-volume seasons, Bringg consistently performed without major downtime.

Pros : Bringg remains stable even during peak delivery periods.

Cons : System updates sometimes require retraining.

Switched from : Locus

Reason to switch : Locus offered optimization features, but Bringg felt more mature for day-to-day delivery execution.

4.3/5

“Best Suited for Complex Delivery Ecosystems”

Bringg became the backbone of our last-mile operations. It’s powerful, flexible, and enterprise-ready.

Pros : Bringg handles complex delivery rules, workflows, and customer communication well.

Cons : Overkill for very small delivery businesses.

Switched from : Onfleet

Reason to switch : Onfleet was easier initially, but Bringg offered more customization and control as we scaled.

4.3/5

“Flexible Integrations With Carriers and Systems”

The integration flexibility allowed us to connect Bringg with our existing tech stack without replacing everything.

Pros : Bringg integrates well with third-party carriers, ERP systems, and custom APIs.

Cons : Some integrations require developer resources.

Switched from : Salesforce Field Service

Reason to switch : Salesforce Field Service was more service-focused, while Bringg specialized in delivery logistics.