Cypress

Testing Automation Software

Get Free Demo

Cypress Alternatives

Playwright

Testing Automation Software

Get Free Demo

Playwright Alternatives

Pricing
Industries
Features
Reviews
Gallery
Platform

Starting at

$ 75.00 /month

Get Best Price

Price On Request

Get Best Price

All industries

All industries

Vendor Management
Ratings & Reviews
Hassle Free And Error Free Cheque Writing
Powerful Reporting Suite
On-device debugging

View all Cypress features

Software Management
Build Test Automation
UI on Handled Devices
API
Multiple unit term measurement

View all Playwright features

Have you used Cypress before?
Write a Review

Have you used Playwright before?
Write a Review

View Images/Videos

Have you used Cypress before?
Write a Review

Have you used Playwright before?
Write a Review

Deployment

Web Based
On Premises

Device Supported

Desktop
Mobile
Tablet
iPad

Operating System

Ubuntu
Windows
iOS
Android
Mac OS
Windows(Phone)
Linux

Deployment

Web Based
On Premises

Device Supported

Desktop
Mobile
Tablet
iPad

Operating System

Ubuntu
Windows
iOS
Android
Mac OS
Windows(Phone)
Linux

Cypress VS Playwright : Comparision Video

A Quick Comparison Between Cypress and Playwright

Let’s have a detailed comparison of Cypress vs Playwright to find out which one is better. Let’s discover some of the essential factors that you must consider and decide whether Cypress or Playwright fits your business.

When it comes to web application testing, choosing the right automation testing framework is crucial for ensuring efficiency, reliability, and scalability. Cypress and Playwright are two popular choices among developers and QA engineers, each offering unique features and advantages. In this comparison, we'll delve into the strengths and weaknesses of Cypress and Playwright across various aspects to help you make an informed decision for your testing needs.

Cypress vs. Playwright: Overview

Cypress and Playwright are both modern testing frameworks designed to simplify and streamline the process of writing and executing tests for web applications.

Cypress is renowned for its simplicity and developer-friendly experience. With its built-in test runner, automatic waiting, and real-time reloads, Cypress offers a seamless testing experience, particularly for developers familiar with JavaScript.

Playwright, developed by Microsoft, is known for its cross-browser testing capabilities and support for multiple programming languages including JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and more. Playwright's strength lies in its ability to automate tasks across different browsers and devices, making it a versatile choice for testing web applications.

Cypress vs. Playwright: Pros and Cons

Cypress primarily focuses on JavaScript with limited community-developed support for other languages. Whereas Playwright supports multiple programming languages natively such as JavaScript, Python, .NET, and Java.
Cypress does not have native mobile testing support. Users must rely on third-party apps or plugins to add mobile testing features. On the other hand, with Playwright, users can test apps on mobile phones or tablets by using their mobile emulation feature.
Both Cypress and Playwright offer a real-time reloading feature to retry tests as code changes. However, Playwright’s reloading feature is not as strong compared to Cypress.
Cypress is limited to testing in Chromium-based browsers, which may be a drawback for projects requiring cross-browser compatibility testing. Playwright, on the other hand, offers broader browser support, including Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, making it suitable for cross-browser testing scenarios.

Playwright vs Cypress: In Terms of Features

Test Runner: Cypress comes with a built-in test runner, offering a simplified experience for running and managing tests. Playwright on the other hand, does not have a built-in test runner. Users need to choose and integrate a separate test runner like Mocha, Jest, or Jasmine.
Debugging: Cypress offers a better visual debugger with features like time travel and test runner, making debugging tests straightforward. On the other hand, Playwright’s debugging can be a bit tricky as it requires integration with external debugging tools for troubleshooting.
Flake resistance: Both Cypress and Playwright offer robust features for flake resistance. However, Cypress has a built-in Flake Detection feature that helps users detect bugs with ease. On the other hand, Playwright doesn't have any Flake Detection feature.

Playwright and Cypress: Integration

Cypress provides seamless integration with popular testing frameworks and CI/CD tools, including CircleCI, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and more. Moreover, it also supports integration with various third-party services such as Jira, Slack, Teams, and so on.

Playwright also offers similar integration capabilities with various CI/CDs, Jenkins, Azure Pipelines etc. However, it is not extensive as compared to Cypress.

Cypress vs. Playwright: Pricing

Cypress offers a monthly and subscription-based pricing model which starts at $75/month. On the other hand, Playwright provides pricing on a per minute basis i.e. $0.01/1 minute test. The pricing plans for both platforms are following:

Cypress:

Free: Free to use plan with 500 test results
Team: Starts at $75/month with 10,000 test results
Business: Starts at $300/month with 10,000 test results and extra features such as Flake Detection, History, & Severity, Jira integration etc.
Enterprise: Available on request

Playwright:

Linux: Starts at $0.01/1 minute test
Windows: Starts at $0.02/1 minute test

Cypress vs. Playwright: Community and Support

Cypress boasts a vibrant community of developers and testers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums available for support. Cypress also offers dedicated customer support for paid users.

Playwright’s community is small compared to Cypress, but it is still growing. It also offers a Discord community, documentation, GitHub discussions and Stack Overflow.

Which is Better, Cypress or Playwright?

Both Cypress and Playwright are powerful testing frameworks that offer unique features and advantages for automating web application tests. Cypress excels in simplicity and developer experience, while Playwright shines in cross-browser testing and versatility.

Ultimately, the choice between Cypress and Playwright depends on your specific testing requirements, project constraints, and team preferences.

Whether you prioritize ease of use, browser compatibility, or advanced features, both Cypress and Playwright offer robust solutions for ensuring the quality and reliability of your web applications.

FAQs

Is Cypress better than Playwright?

Cypress can be a better Playwright alternative if developers prefer simplicity and JavaScript-centric testing. However, Playwright shines for testing and versatility, catering to diverse programming languages and browser environments. The choice depends on priorities like ease of use or broad testing coverage.

Are Cypress and Playwright the same?

No, Cypress and Playwright differ in their approach and strengths. Cypress emphasizes simplicity and developer experience, offering a built-in test runner and strong JavaScript support. In contrast, Playwright excels in cross-browser testing and supports multiple languages, providing versatility for diverse testing needs.

Which is Better, Cypress or Playwright?

The better choice between Cypress and Playwright depends on your specific testing requirements and project constraints. Cypress offers simplicity and ease of use, while Playwright provides versatility and extensive browser support. You must consider factors like programming language preference and testing environment diversity to make an informed decision.

Is Cypress the same as Playwright?

No, Cypress and Playwright are distinct automation testing frameworks with different features and strengths. Cypress focuses on simplicity and JavaScript support, featuring a built-in test runner. In contrast, Playwright emphasizes cross-browser testing and versatility, supporting multiple languages and browsers.

Can Playwright replace Cypress?

Playwright can be an ideal Cypress alternative if you require cross browser testing support. For instance, it offers broader browser support, including Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, making it suitable for cross-browser testing scenarios.

What is the difference between Cypress and Playwright?

Cypress emphasizes simplicity, offering a built-in test runner and strong JavaScript support. In contrast, Playwright prioritizes cross-browser testing and versatility, supporting multiple programming languages and browser environments. Additionally, Playwright provides native mobile emulation and broader browser compatibility compared to Cypress.