Postman VS Thunder Client

How are Postman and Thunder Client Different?

Thunder Client is a lightweight, quick, and easy extension for Visual Studio Code. Developers can test APIs straight from the editor of this API testing tool. It is best suited for developers who would like to remain in their current development environment rather than switch between multiple tools. Thunder Client supports features like request construction, response viewing, and basic testing, without requiring a user to exit Visual Studio Code.

In contrast, Postman is a stand-alone platform for API testing. It is a complete suite of tools for creating, testing, and documenting APIs. This API testing tool is a top choice for both individual engineers and bigger teams because of its advanced automation possibilities, comprehensive reports, and collaborative tools. Along with a wider range of testing features like automated tests, mock servers, and monitoring, Postman also facilitates integrations with other CI/CD technologies.

Comparison Table: Thunder Client vs Postman

The following list of differences between Thunder Client and Postman can help you choose which is better for your business goals.

Detailed Feature Comparison of Thunder Client vs Postman

Ease of Use

For developers who use Visual Studio Code and desire a simple, lightweight approach to API testing, Thunder Client was created. Its user interface is straightforward, minimalistic, and intuitive. Postman, while still user-friendly, has a more feature-packed UI. The extra features offer in-depth functionality for larger teams and intricate workflows, but they make the initial learning curve a little steeper.

Which is Better?

If you're already using VS Code, Thunder Client wins for its simplicity. However, if you need more advanced features and collaboration, Postman is the better option.

Testing Capabilities

Basic API testing options offered by Thunder Client include submitting various request types, viewing responses, and manually checking data. Whereas, Postman goes above and beyond with its automated testing, pre- and post-request scripts, and comprehensive test reports. For automated testing, it also interfaces with CI/CD pipelines.

Which is Better?

The Thunder Client is adequate for simple testing. However, Postman is better for reliable, automated testing and monitoring.

Collaboration

Because Thunder Client is an extension of Visual Studio Code, its collaboration options are limited. It does not provide versioning or a cloud-based workspace. Postman excels in this area by providing comprehensive version control, team workspaces, and collection sharing. Additionally, you can provide feedback on certain requests and answers, which facilitates teamwork.

Which is Better?

Postman is a better option for teams and businesses because of its exceptional collaboration capabilities.

Mock Servers and Monitoring

Mock servers and monitoring features are not available in Thunder Client. With Postman's support for both, developers can test or demo APIs and keep an eye on them to make sure they're operating as intended over time.

Which is Better?

Thunder Client does not have the extensive mock server and monitoring tools that Postman does.

Environment Variables

To transition between several API environments (such as development, staging, and production), Thunder Client and Postman both offer environment variables. On the other hand, Postman has a more sophisticated environment variable system that can be used in scripts and offers additional customisation options.

Which is Better?

Although environment variables are supported by both tools, Postman offers a more reliable and adaptable approach.

Support

With tools like documentation and a help centre, Thunder Client provides community-driven support. However, it lacks the same degree of committed, 24-hour customer support because it is a Visual Studio Code extension. It doesn't provide round-the-clock help, and support can occasionally be delayed. For business users, Postman offers greater customer service that is available 24/7. It also provides email assistance, online chat, and a comprehensive knowledge base.

Which is Better?

Postman is a better API testing tool that provides 24/7 support with additional assistance.

Postman vs Thunder Client: Pricing

Core functionalities are available in Postman's free plan. However, teams and enterprise-level features are more expensive. While enterprise pricing is $49 per user/month (billed annually), team pricing starts at $14 per user/month for the Basic plan and $29 per user/month for the Professional plan.

Because Thunder Client is free to use, developers searching for a portable and affordable solution find it very interesting. Its enterprise pricing starts from $16 per user/month (billed annually), team pricing starts at $3 per user/month for the Starter plan and $7 per user/month for the Business plan.

These are annual plans, if you prefer to choose the monthly mode of payment, then prices may vary. You can request additional pricing information and product-related discounts with our customer service team.

Techjockey Verdict: Thunder Client or Postman?

For developers looking for a quick, easy, and free tool that integrates with their development environment (VS Code), Thunder Client is ideal. For small teams or individual developers who require simple API testing with minimal overhead, it's perfect.

Teams or businesses that need advanced functionality like automated testing, monitoring, communication tools, and mock servers are better suited for Postman. For more complicated workflows and bigger projects, it's a potent solution.

The decision ultimately comes down to your particular requirements. Thunder Client is an excellent option if you need something quick, lightweight, and cost-free. Postman might be a great solution if you need more sophisticated capabilities or are dealing with a larger team.

For further product-related queries, please reach out to our Techjockey Team.