What rollback and comms plan should we prepare in case the Razorpay Subscriptions roll-out causes performance regressions?

Potential change-freeze windows

• Thursday, October 2nd: Mahatma Gandhi Jayanti and coincides with Dussehra.
• Saturday, October 11th - Sunday, October 12th: October 11th is a regional holiday in many states, Saturday and October 12th is a Bank Holiday across all of India for Dussehra.
• Monday, October 20th: Diwali/Deepavali

For most Google Workspace admins or even end users, exporting Google Pay transaction logs straight to an external SIEM with granular, least-privilege scopes is not a standard, directly available feature. Google Pay is part of the Google ecosystem, and Google is largely in charge of managing its logs internally.
However, the process entails utilizing Google Workspace's integration with Google Security Operations (formerly Chronicle SIEM) if the context is about exporting Google Workspace activity logs associated with Google Pay usage (e.g., administrative actions, user activity related to Google Wallet/Pay settings within Google Workspace).

Your rollback and communications strategy should put transaction integrity, customer trust, and quick recovery first if your PhonePe rollout results in performance regressions, such as delayed payment confirmations, unsuccessful UPI mandates, or webhook timeouts.

Make sure you have already backed up your API keys, webhook URLs, and transaction logs for the prior integration version in order to do a rollback. In order to immediately reroute UPI traffic from the new PhonePe flow back to your backup PSP (such as Razorpay or Paytm) without any delay, keep a feature flag or routing toggle handy. To prevent double debits or lost callbacks, temporarily halt new transactions during rollback. Only then, after end-to-end payment confirmation and settlement flow have been verified, can the previous integration be restored.

On the communications front, avoid confusion by informing your finance, operations, and support teams first so they can respond to questions in a consistent manner. The following could be your internal message: Since the most recent PhonePe roll-out, we've seen slower UPI response times. To ensure stability, we are reverting to the prior integration; payments are safe, and no client funds are in jeopardy. Externally, provide a brief update on your social media pages and status page in case users encounter any delays, stressing that payments are secure and will be attempted automatically again.
Document validation tests for upcoming rollouts (such as synthetic UPI testing, webhook latency thresholds, or reconciliation dry runs) and do a post-mortem after the rollback to determine what went wrong, whether it was API latency, rate constraints, or schema mismatches. The objective is straightforward: demonstrate your openness, technical readiness, and dedication to uptime, even in the event that things must be pulled back.

You must monitor both operational efficiency and system stability metrics to demonstrate that an NPCI update (such as new UPI APIs, transaction caps, or rule modifications) increased team productivity without increasing risk. Regarding productivity, start with the workload associated with manual reconciliation, the average time to execute NPCI compliance adjustments, and the transaction throughput per engineer. Your staff is working smarter, not harder, if these drop. Additionally, you may track the automation coverage of UPI procedures (such as auto-retries, reconciliation scripts, or refunds) and the number of support tickets pertaining to payments; fewer tickets typically indicate that the upgrade made operations simpler.

Pay attention to the transaction success rate, UPI response latency, and NPCI compliance alerts when it comes to risk. Decline rates, timeout percentages, and instances of fraud or duplicate transactions should all remain flat or lower in a stable update. Additionally, monitor the frequency of post-deployment rollbacks; lower rollbacks suggest dependability and confidence.

You must monitor both operational efficiency and system stability metrics to demonstrate that an NPCI update (such as new UPI APIs, transaction caps, or rule modifications) increased team productivity without increasing risk. Regarding productivity, start with the workload associated with manual reconciliation, the average time to execute NPCI compliance adjustments, and the transaction throughput per engineer. Your staff is working smarter, not harder, if these drop. Additionally, you may track the automation coverage of UPI procedures (such as auto-retries, reconciliation scripts, or refunds) and the number of support tickets pertaining to payments; fewer tickets typically indicate that the upgrade made operations simpler.

Pay attention to the transaction success rate, UPI response latency, and NPCI compliance alerts when it comes to risk. Decline rates, timeout percentages, and instances of fraud or duplicate transactions should all remain flat or lower in a stable update. Additionally, monitor the frequency of post-deployment rollbacks; lower rollbacks suggest dependability and confidence.