Loopcv Reviews & Ratings

4.5/5

“Tried Premium—but got no matches until tech bug fixed”

I upgraded to Premium expecting full automation—300 apps/month, recruiter pitching, analytics. Yet initially no matches, zero applications. After escalation, support admitted a technical bug and later resolved it. Refund process was convoluted before resolution.

Pros : Premium plan offers robust outreach, up to 300 applications and CV checks

Cons : A bug impacted matching for some users—leading to no applications and refund challenges

Switched from : Talismatic

Reason to switch : Needed scale and results-fast automation.

4.5/5

“Works Great If You’re Patient and Monitor Closely”

Coming from browser extensions like LazyApply, I wanted more automation control. LoopCV runs loops daily and sends emails—but sometimes emails were stuck because loops paused. You have to check often. If you're hands-off, you might miss the actual send.

Pros : Saves hours applying, provides recruiter outreach, customizable loops

Cons : Needs careful monitoring to ensure applications are actually sent

Switched from : LazyApply

Reason to switch : Wanted central control with customization per loop.

4.5/5

“The UI Is Slick, But It Didn’t Work for Me”

Switched from free job board alerts to LoopCV hoping for seamless auto-apply. The UI is really smooth, but I got a list of jobs and no applications were sent. Support claimed auto-apply was disabled by me. I’d hoped for more clarity or default settings.

Pros : Dashboard is clean, creating loops is intuitive

Cons : Auto-apply didn’t trigger; support credited setting misconfiguration

Switched from : Teamtailor

Reason to switch : Wanted true automation instead of browsing lists.

4.5/5

“Affordable Plans, But Some Features Lacking Depth”

I switched from a custom resume service to LoopCV for better scale. Plans cost $13/mo up to premium tiers with advisory, which is transparent. But job filters aren’t precise—sometimes I’d get irrelevant roles—and analytics are minimal. It’s okay for volume, but lacks fine control.

Pros : Clear pricing, affordable plans up to 300 applications/month

Cons : Filters lack precision and analytics are basic

Switched from : Attest360

Reason to switch : Wanted automation with clear, affordable pricing.

4.5/5

“Supportive Team—When They Answer”

I switched from other automation tools to LoopCV based on industry praise. The founders were personally active, replying to feedback. But for me, support responses were slow and inconsistent—sometimes helpful, other times completely silent when I needed them.

Pros : Some users praise direct engagement from founders and tool creators

Cons : Inconsistent service; delays common

Switched from : TurboHire

Reason to switch : Wanted direct developer support and community responsiveness.

4.3/5

“Saved Me Hours But Sometimes Sent Weird Applications”

I switched from manually applying on LinkedIn to LoopCV because I wanted something smarter than just hitting “Easy Apply”. LoopCV auto-finds recruiter emails and applies for me. It saved massive time, but sometimes applications went to wrong roles or were overly generic—leading to spammy responses. Still, I got a few interview invites too.

Pros : Automates job search, sends outreach emails to recruiters, good dashboard insights

Cons : Occasionally applies to irrelevant roles or sends generic emails

Switched from : BOT Shreyasi

Reason to switch : Needed automation and more job visibility with minimal effort.

4.3/5

“Mixed Results: Somety uses it well, others say no apps happened”

I switched from basic email alerts to LoopCV after reading success stories. Some users reported landing roles quickly. However, others—including a refund seek caused by zero actual sends—even though loops were active. The inconsistency worried me.

Pros : Many users say they landed jobs and found hidden roles via LoopCV

Cons : Others say no real submissions happened despite matches

Reason to switch : Wanted automated loops to scale outreach.

4.3/5

“Helped Organize My Job Hunt But Got Spam After Use”

I was using Google Sheets to track job apps until LoopCV centralized my loops and stats. It was neat—until I noticed spam in my inbox and some loops sent resumes to unrelated roles—even non-existent ones. I had a required call with support to qualify for refund.

Pros : Centralized loop management, good metrics to track openings

Cons : After usage, received phishing spam and irrelevant emails

Switched from : Sentrient

Reason to switch : Needed better organization and analytics for my job search.

4.2/5

“I Landed Interviews Fast—But Customer Support Let Me Down”

I moved from Indeed and remote job boards to LoopCV. In just one week my email inbox pinged with interview invites. But when the system glitched, support took days to reply—even then, I had to follow up multiple times.

Pros : Landed interviews within two weeks, filters matched my preferences well

Cons : Support was unresponsive when glitches occurred

Switched from : Indeed

Reason to switch : Needed proactive applications, not just alerts.

4.2/5

“Multiple Loops Are Handled Well But Sometimes Jobs Are Missed”

I created separate loops for remote marketing, data roles, and writing gigs. LoopCV managed them fine and even let me test different resumes. Yet I realized it didn't catch many remote gigs I found manually. The filtering wasn’t broad enough in some categories.

Pros : Handles multiple job loops concurrently, easy A/B testing of CVs

Cons : May miss niche roles or specific remote positions

Switched from : TrueRMS

Reason to switch : Wanted scalable multi-loop automation for varied job types.